Having problems with your Dissertations or proposal, this blog provides Ideas on how to generate content for your assignments at all levels of education. If you need more assistance, drop me an email at villasowiny@gmail.com would be glad to assist.
Friday, 27 December 2013
Epistemology
Introduction
Epistemology refers to a branch of philosophy that which is concerned with justified
belief and knowledge. Epistemology attempts to answer questions such as what differentiates
inadequate knowledge (false) to adequate knowledge (true), what are the limits and structure
of knowledge, what are the sufficient and necessary conditions of knowledge? What
makes justified beliefs justifiable? Practically questions that epistemology seeks to answer,
translates into matters of scientific methodology: how can an individual develop models or
theories that are superior to competing theories (Roots 2007).
Epistemology and research
In research, an epistemological stance will influence how one chooses a
research topic as well as the methodology and methods you use. Epistemology is concerned
with the limitations of knowledge, nature and sources. Epistemological orientations
determine and shapes how we view the world, and of reality (Roots 2007). They too provide
researchers with guiding principles, from where researchers can base their methodologies. As
such, the epistemological positions relates closely with methodological approaches, and they
determine the process from the point that they allow researchers to come up with questions,
design the study as well as to choose the correct research strategies (Sedgwick 1990). Some
of the cross-culture researches are based on a realistic point of view at epistemological level.
Epistemological realism makes assumptions that the external reality accessible, cognitively to
researcher. The realism epistemology portrays the culture as a stable, existing and real
systems of practices and beliefs, and as such it is argued that culture as an objective and
independent phenomenon can be accurately observed, investigated and measured. This point
of view which epistemology views culture, leads to a positivistic/analytical research strategy,
making the researcher perceive reality as concrete, tangible, hard, stable and real along with
deterministic relations among its constituent parts (Easterby-Smith 2012). The goal of
positivistic/analytical research is to describe objective reality as something possible since
most of the times an assumption is made that only that there is only one possible answer to a
research question. The proponents of the positivistic approach majors on the methodology
unity of all sciences and disagree with the fundamental differences between social and
natural sciences. An individual’s epistemological position portrays the “view of what we
know about the world and how can we know it”.
Epistemology is firmly integrated in the ontological belief that the subject of human
being’s behaviour is manifest of a rule and order controlled by external reality. Implying that
there is conceptual perspective that human actions and behaviours are by far determined by
stimuli which is not caused by the humans themselves (Roots 2007). Logical positivism has
continued over the years to inform much of the educational research and has significantly
impacted the manner in which knowledge about education is disseminated and gathered.
In America, the American Association for Education Research has indicated an increase
in orientation within initiatives funded by the federal institutions to carry out research
based primarily on collection of scientific evidence...
Epistemology refers to a branch of philosophy that which is concerned with justified
belief and knowledge. Epistemology attempts to answer questions such as what differentiates
inadequate knowledge (false) to adequate knowledge (true), what are the limits and structure
of knowledge, what are the sufficient and necessary conditions of knowledge? What
makes justified beliefs justifiable? Practically questions that epistemology seeks to answer,
translates into matters of scientific methodology: how can an individual develop models or
theories that are superior to competing theories (Roots 2007).
Epistemology and research
In research, an epistemological stance will influence how one chooses a
research topic as well as the methodology and methods you use. Epistemology is concerned
with the limitations of knowledge, nature and sources. Epistemological orientations
determine and shapes how we view the world, and of reality (Roots 2007). They too provide
researchers with guiding principles, from where researchers can base their methodologies. As
such, the epistemological positions relates closely with methodological approaches, and they
determine the process from the point that they allow researchers to come up with questions,
design the study as well as to choose the correct research strategies (Sedgwick 1990). Some
of the cross-culture researches are based on a realistic point of view at epistemological level.
Epistemological realism makes assumptions that the external reality accessible, cognitively to
researcher. The realism epistemology portrays the culture as a stable, existing and real
systems of practices and beliefs, and as such it is argued that culture as an objective and
independent phenomenon can be accurately observed, investigated and measured. This point
of view which epistemology views culture, leads to a positivistic/analytical research strategy,
making the researcher perceive reality as concrete, tangible, hard, stable and real along with
deterministic relations among its constituent parts (Easterby-Smith 2012). The goal of
positivistic/analytical research is to describe objective reality as something possible since
most of the times an assumption is made that only that there is only one possible answer to a
research question. The proponents of the positivistic approach majors on the methodology
unity of all sciences and disagree with the fundamental differences between social and
natural sciences. An individual’s epistemological position portrays the “view of what we
know about the world and how can we know it”.
Epistemology is firmly integrated in the ontological belief that the subject of human
being’s behaviour is manifest of a rule and order controlled by external reality. Implying that
there is conceptual perspective that human actions and behaviours are by far determined by
stimuli which is not caused by the humans themselves (Roots 2007). Logical positivism has
continued over the years to inform much of the educational research and has significantly
impacted the manner in which knowledge about education is disseminated and gathered.
In America, the American Association for Education Research has indicated an increase
in orientation within initiatives funded by the federal institutions to carry out research
based primarily on collection of scientific evidence...
Epistemology
Introduction
Epistemology refers to a branch of philosophy that which is concerned with justified
belief and knowledge. Epistemology attempts to answer questions such as what differentiates
inadequate knowledge (false) to adequate knowledge (true), what are the limits and structure
of knowledge, what are the sufficient and necessary conditions of knowledge? What
makes justified beliefs justifiable? Practically questions that epistemology seeks to answer,
translates into matters of scientific methodology: how can an individual develop models or
theories that are superior to competing theories (Roots 2007).
Epistemology and research
In research, an epistemological stance will influence how one chooses a
research topic as well as the methodology and methods you use. Epistemology is concerned
with the limitations of knowledge, nature and sources. Epistemological orientations
determine and shapes how we view the world, and of reality (Roots 2007). They too provide
researchers with guiding principles, from where researchers can base their methodologies. As
such, the epistemological positions relates closely with methodological approaches, and they
determine the process from the point that they allow researchers to come up with questions,
design the study as well as to choose the correct research strategies (Sedgwick 1990). Some
of the cross-culture researches are based on a realistic point of view at epistemological level.
Epistemological realism makes assumptions that the external reality accessible, cognitively to
researcher. The realism epistemology portrays the culture as a stable, existing and real
systems of practices and beliefs, and as such it is argued that culture as an objective and
independent phenomenon can be accurately observed, investigated and measured. This point
of view which epistemology views culture, leads to a positivistic/analytical research strategy,
making the researcher perceive reality as concrete, tangible, hard, stable and real along with
deterministic relations among its constituent parts (Easterby-Smith 2012). The goal of
positivistic/analytical research is to describe objective reality as something possible since
most of the times an assumption is made that only that there is only one possible answer to a
research question. The proponents of the positivistic approach majors on the methodology
unity of all sciences and disagree with the fundamental differences between social and
natural sciences. An individual’s epistemological position portrays the “view of what we
know about the world and how can we know it”.
Epistemology is firmly integrated in the ontological belief that the subject of human
being’s behaviour is manifest of a rule and order controlled by external reality. Implying that
there is conceptual perspective that human actions and behaviours are by far determined by
stimuli which is not caused by the humans themselves (Roots 2007). Logical positivism has
continued over the years to inform much of the educational research and has significantly
impacted the manner in which knowledge about education is disseminated and gathered.
In America, the American Association for Education Research has indicated an increase
in orientation within initiatives funded by the federal institutions to carry out research
based primarily on collection of scientific evidence...
Epistemology refers to a branch of philosophy that which is concerned with justified
belief and knowledge. Epistemology attempts to answer questions such as what differentiates
inadequate knowledge (false) to adequate knowledge (true), what are the limits and structure
of knowledge, what are the sufficient and necessary conditions of knowledge? What
makes justified beliefs justifiable? Practically questions that epistemology seeks to answer,
translates into matters of scientific methodology: how can an individual develop models or
theories that are superior to competing theories (Roots 2007).
Epistemology and research
In research, an epistemological stance will influence how one chooses a
research topic as well as the methodology and methods you use. Epistemology is concerned
with the limitations of knowledge, nature and sources. Epistemological orientations
determine and shapes how we view the world, and of reality (Roots 2007). They too provide
researchers with guiding principles, from where researchers can base their methodologies. As
such, the epistemological positions relates closely with methodological approaches, and they
determine the process from the point that they allow researchers to come up with questions,
design the study as well as to choose the correct research strategies (Sedgwick 1990). Some
of the cross-culture researches are based on a realistic point of view at epistemological level.
Epistemological realism makes assumptions that the external reality accessible, cognitively to
researcher. The realism epistemology portrays the culture as a stable, existing and real
systems of practices and beliefs, and as such it is argued that culture as an objective and
independent phenomenon can be accurately observed, investigated and measured. This point
of view which epistemology views culture, leads to a positivistic/analytical research strategy,
making the researcher perceive reality as concrete, tangible, hard, stable and real along with
deterministic relations among its constituent parts (Easterby-Smith 2012). The goal of
positivistic/analytical research is to describe objective reality as something possible since
most of the times an assumption is made that only that there is only one possible answer to a
research question. The proponents of the positivistic approach majors on the methodology
unity of all sciences and disagree with the fundamental differences between social and
natural sciences. An individual’s epistemological position portrays the “view of what we
know about the world and how can we know it”.
Epistemology is firmly integrated in the ontological belief that the subject of human
being’s behaviour is manifest of a rule and order controlled by external reality. Implying that
there is conceptual perspective that human actions and behaviours are by far determined by
stimuli which is not caused by the humans themselves (Roots 2007). Logical positivism has
continued over the years to inform much of the educational research and has significantly
impacted the manner in which knowledge about education is disseminated and gathered.
In America, the American Association for Education Research has indicated an increase
in orientation within initiatives funded by the federal institutions to carry out research
based primarily on collection of scientific evidence...
Organizational Culture
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE 2
Problem statement
This project paper will investigate the declining profits at Zetech Technologies.
The report seeks to establish the reason behind the declining sales of Zetech products, and
if any internal issues might be the cause of the poor performance. This paper servers as a
written report detailing the investigation, root cause analysis, solution, implementation, and
evaluation plan regarding this problem.
Company background
Zetech technologies finds itself in a very competitive industry, one that in the recent
times has seen major innovations take place. The mobile phone industry, which due to the
changing dynamics in the world of technology, has changed it to smartphone industry, where
mobile phones are becoming obsolete and inferior to the smartphone. Smartphone industry
is defined by the type of Operating Software a particular smartphone is using. Currently
the most popular Operating Software in the smartphone market include: Google’s android
software that is being used by high ended devices such as Samsung, LG, HTC among others,
Microsoft’s windows software, Apple’s IOs software and the Symbian software, that was
being used on Nokia smartphones until the adopted they window’s software from Microsoft.
Google’s android software appears to be controlling the market, with many phones adopting
it, followed by IOs which is limited to only Apple phones then to Windows which was
launched first on the Nokia platform. Zetech’s greatest challenge would be Samsung who
have emerged as the market giant in the smartphone market, even beating the arch rivals
Apple’s IPhone. Other key market players who possess a lot of challenge for the England
based company would be HTC and LG electronics (Falaki et al, 2010).
Zetech cooperation is a multinational cooperation, information technology
cooperation, headquartered in London, England. The company’s main products are portable
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE 3
IT devices and mobile telephones. The company, the company owns a networking company
known as Zetech Solutions and Networks, which provides telecommunications network
services and equipment’s. Zetech has an employee base of 101, 982 employee, and operates
in more than 150 countries. The company was co-founded by Fredrik Idestam and Leo
Mechelin in 1865. The company was established as a ground wood pulp mill in south western
England.
Problem background
In the recent years, Zetech did not only struggle in making improved phones for its
customers, but it struggled to adapt culturally to the changing business environment. Zetech
faced fierce competition from key players in the mobile sector. Asian manufacturers were
becoming more aggressive in the smartphone industry, so did American computer companies.
Zetech on the other hand was busy converting its operating software to open source, and
operating at a huge scale, with an excess of sales of 450 million devices annually. Zetech’s
major problems started when they failed to recognise the competition that was bring fronted
by Google’s android software. Zetech failed to establish a competitor movement for the
emerging Android software. In fact Zetech had the capability of overpowering Android
by the virtue of each participant market share. Zetech’s decline is often cited to Apple’s
entry into the smartphone industry. Apart from fierce competition from Google and Apple
smartphones, the decline in Zetech market share has been greatly attributed to Symbian
open source movement. Zetech leadership were responsible for the execution of Symbian
Open Source initiatives. No support was however given to the initiatives and the foundation,
which means no progress could be observed in this sector, and relatively contributed to the
decline in sales. The effects of this menace has greatly been seen on the overall performance
of Zetech handsets across the world, they have been overtaken by Samsung which controls
major stokes on the international market (Falaki et al, 2010).
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE 4
Root Cause Analysis & Results
The cause of this problem can be attributed to four major factors:
• Lack of new ideas
• Stiff competition
• Political
• Inability to recognise the competition
Inability to recognise competition
There is a reason why the once perennial market leader was eliminated to the second
position, and one of those reason can be attributed to either wrong business strategies or
naivety, one that would cost Zetech its market share in major international markets.
Problem statement
This project paper will investigate the declining profits at Zetech Technologies.
The report seeks to establish the reason behind the declining sales of Zetech products, and
if any internal issues might be the cause of the poor performance. This paper servers as a
written report detailing the investigation, root cause analysis, solution, implementation, and
evaluation plan regarding this problem.
Company background
Zetech technologies finds itself in a very competitive industry, one that in the recent
times has seen major innovations take place. The mobile phone industry, which due to the
changing dynamics in the world of technology, has changed it to smartphone industry, where
mobile phones are becoming obsolete and inferior to the smartphone. Smartphone industry
is defined by the type of Operating Software a particular smartphone is using. Currently
the most popular Operating Software in the smartphone market include: Google’s android
software that is being used by high ended devices such as Samsung, LG, HTC among others,
Microsoft’s windows software, Apple’s IOs software and the Symbian software, that was
being used on Nokia smartphones until the adopted they window’s software from Microsoft.
Google’s android software appears to be controlling the market, with many phones adopting
it, followed by IOs which is limited to only Apple phones then to Windows which was
launched first on the Nokia platform. Zetech’s greatest challenge would be Samsung who
have emerged as the market giant in the smartphone market, even beating the arch rivals
Apple’s IPhone. Other key market players who possess a lot of challenge for the England
based company would be HTC and LG electronics (Falaki et al, 2010).
Zetech cooperation is a multinational cooperation, information technology
cooperation, headquartered in London, England. The company’s main products are portable
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE 3
IT devices and mobile telephones. The company, the company owns a networking company
known as Zetech Solutions and Networks, which provides telecommunications network
services and equipment’s. Zetech has an employee base of 101, 982 employee, and operates
in more than 150 countries. The company was co-founded by Fredrik Idestam and Leo
Mechelin in 1865. The company was established as a ground wood pulp mill in south western
England.
Problem background
In the recent years, Zetech did not only struggle in making improved phones for its
customers, but it struggled to adapt culturally to the changing business environment. Zetech
faced fierce competition from key players in the mobile sector. Asian manufacturers were
becoming more aggressive in the smartphone industry, so did American computer companies.
Zetech on the other hand was busy converting its operating software to open source, and
operating at a huge scale, with an excess of sales of 450 million devices annually. Zetech’s
major problems started when they failed to recognise the competition that was bring fronted
by Google’s android software. Zetech failed to establish a competitor movement for the
emerging Android software. In fact Zetech had the capability of overpowering Android
by the virtue of each participant market share. Zetech’s decline is often cited to Apple’s
entry into the smartphone industry. Apart from fierce competition from Google and Apple
smartphones, the decline in Zetech market share has been greatly attributed to Symbian
open source movement. Zetech leadership were responsible for the execution of Symbian
Open Source initiatives. No support was however given to the initiatives and the foundation,
which means no progress could be observed in this sector, and relatively contributed to the
decline in sales. The effects of this menace has greatly been seen on the overall performance
of Zetech handsets across the world, they have been overtaken by Samsung which controls
major stokes on the international market (Falaki et al, 2010).
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE 4
Root Cause Analysis & Results
The cause of this problem can be attributed to four major factors:
• Lack of new ideas
• Stiff competition
• Political
• Inability to recognise the competition
Inability to recognise competition
There is a reason why the once perennial market leader was eliminated to the second
position, and one of those reason can be attributed to either wrong business strategies or
naivety, one that would cost Zetech its market share in major international markets.
proposal of dissertation on Expo 2020 in dubai ( strategy )
Introduction
Hosting major world events such as the World Expo for UAE has it benefits for
the host country. Countries stand to gain from major events through tourism, job creation,
infrastructure development, investment opportunities and the country’s status on the
international market (Network et al 2010).
Objectives and aims
The objectives and aims of hosting the World Expo would be:
• Align the community around a shared mission
• Exchange knowledge and growing understanding
• Foster relationship between nations.
• Attract millions of visitors to the host city.
• Become a centre of development and innovation in the theme area for the host
country.
• Make the host country a recognized world centre for work and though on the theme
subject.
The bid should be welcomed, since UAE stands to gain more if they win the bid, as well
as more if they lose. The World Expo provides UAE with an opportunity to showcase their
values out to the world. This is their opportunity to attract large visitors to their country, and
therefor establish a tourism base for the future. This opportunity will enable its neighbours be
able to showcase their innovations to the world as well (Network et al 2010). This therefore
without any doubt, means that UAE stands to get a lot from wining this bid. In the event that
it fails to win the bid, it simply mean that the country won’t be able to exploit all the above
reasons, and therefore no business which is not good for the economy.
Shanghai’s Expo of 2010 was successful, in that china succeeded in transmitting its image
of economic success and global stature, meaning hosting expos therefore has its advantages.
No expo in terms of success is remembered more than the Shanghai Expo and the Great
Exhibition Expo (Wong 2010).
Does Expos exceed cost? Yes they do in certain instances, while in other they don’t. For
example the Great Exhibition of the UK, left a lasting legacy. In that the profits made from
the event, were used to directly fund one of the United Kingdom’s elite academic institutions,
the imperial college. The profits were also used to fund the Science Museum, the National
History Museum, the Albert and Victoria Museum and the whole region surrounding the
Exhibition Road. In other world events such as world cup, the outcome of such events
is financial overruns for the host country, in form of increase in tourism revenues and
construction and infrastructure development (Epps & Demangeo 2013).
Hosting major world events such as the World Expo for UAE has it benefits for
the host country. Countries stand to gain from major events through tourism, job creation,
infrastructure development, investment opportunities and the country’s status on the
international market (Network et al 2010).
Objectives and aims
The objectives and aims of hosting the World Expo would be:
• Align the community around a shared mission
• Exchange knowledge and growing understanding
• Foster relationship between nations.
• Attract millions of visitors to the host city.
• Become a centre of development and innovation in the theme area for the host
country.
• Make the host country a recognized world centre for work and though on the theme
subject.
The bid should be welcomed, since UAE stands to gain more if they win the bid, as well
as more if they lose. The World Expo provides UAE with an opportunity to showcase their
values out to the world. This is their opportunity to attract large visitors to their country, and
therefor establish a tourism base for the future. This opportunity will enable its neighbours be
able to showcase their innovations to the world as well (Network et al 2010). This therefore
without any doubt, means that UAE stands to get a lot from wining this bid. In the event that
it fails to win the bid, it simply mean that the country won’t be able to exploit all the above
reasons, and therefore no business which is not good for the economy.
Shanghai’s Expo of 2010 was successful, in that china succeeded in transmitting its image
of economic success and global stature, meaning hosting expos therefore has its advantages.
No expo in terms of success is remembered more than the Shanghai Expo and the Great
Exhibition Expo (Wong 2010).
Does Expos exceed cost? Yes they do in certain instances, while in other they don’t. For
example the Great Exhibition of the UK, left a lasting legacy. In that the profits made from
the event, were used to directly fund one of the United Kingdom’s elite academic institutions,
the imperial college. The profits were also used to fund the Science Museum, the National
History Museum, the Albert and Victoria Museum and the whole region surrounding the
Exhibition Road. In other world events such as world cup, the outcome of such events
is financial overruns for the host country, in form of increase in tourism revenues and
construction and infrastructure development (Epps & Demangeo 2013).
Business Law: International humanitarian law
Summary
With the rising international conflict among nations, the need to protect individuals who no
longer or are not participating in hostilities is necessary. Therefore, the international law was
constituted to protect these individuals. International humanitarian law is a division of international
law that aims at limiting the effects that armed conflict has on persons who are not actively
participating in a war. International humanitarian law regulates and restricts the means and
methods of warfare accessible to combatants.
The main driving force behind this law is the extenuation of human suffering as well as
considerations of humanity. International humanitarian law, consists of a set of rules, developed by
custom or treaty, that seeks limits the rights to warring parties in a conflict, to use means and
methods of ware fare of their own liking, as well as to protect objects/properties and persons that
are affected by armed warfare. IHL consists of two major conventions, The Hague Conventions
and the Geneva Conventions, as well as other subsequent case law, customary international law
and treaties. The law describes the responsibilities and conduct of neutral nations, belligerent
nations as well as individuals that find themselves in a warfare and are in relation to one another.
IHL is designed in such a way that it balances military necessity and humanitarian concerns,
subjects armed conflicts to the regulation of law through mitigating human suffering and limiting
destructive effects of conflicts.
Review
International humanitarian law is deeply rooted in the rules of ancient religions and
civilizations, which mainly holds the principle that warfare has always been subject to particular
customs and principles. Universal codification of IHL started din the 19
various nations have consented to a series of practical rules, which are based on the bitter
experience exhibited in modern warfare (Meron, 1989). As the International community has
immensely grown, a number of nations have contributed to the development of these rules, such
the International Humanitarian Law currently forms a universal body of the law (Fleck, 2008). The
international humanitarian law is only applicable to armed conflict, and doesn’t cover internal
disturbances such as secluded acts of violence.
IHL is only applicable once a war has begun, and equally to both parties irrespective of
who initiated the fight. IHL clearly distinguishes between noninternational armed conflict and
international armed conflict. (Fleck, 2008) International armed conflicts refer to those conflicts
that at least two states are involved, and are a subject to wide range of rules, that includes the rules
set out in the Additional Protocol I and the 4 Geneva conventions. on the other side, non
international armed conflicts refers to those conflicts that are restricted to a territory of a particular
single state, that either involves armed groups fighting each other or armed groups that are fighting
armed groups of armed dissidents (Forsythe, 2005). A number of limited laws are applicable to
specific internal armed conflicts and are plainly laid down in Article 3 that are common to the 4
Geneva conventions and in Additional Protocol II.
However, it is important though, to differentiate between human rights law and
international humanitarian law. Though some of the rules of these two segments appear similar,
they have separately been developed and are contained in different treaties (Fleck, 2008). For
example, human rights law applies in peacetime, unlike IHL that applies during armed conflicts,
and some of its provisions might be suspended during armed conflicts.
International Humanitarian Law principles and provisions protecting civilians
Distinction Principle
With the rising international conflict among nations, the need to protect individuals who no
longer or are not participating in hostilities is necessary. Therefore, the international law was
constituted to protect these individuals. International humanitarian law is a division of international
law that aims at limiting the effects that armed conflict has on persons who are not actively
participating in a war. International humanitarian law regulates and restricts the means and
methods of warfare accessible to combatants.
The main driving force behind this law is the extenuation of human suffering as well as
considerations of humanity. International humanitarian law, consists of a set of rules, developed by
custom or treaty, that seeks limits the rights to warring parties in a conflict, to use means and
methods of ware fare of their own liking, as well as to protect objects/properties and persons that
are affected by armed warfare. IHL consists of two major conventions, The Hague Conventions
and the Geneva Conventions, as well as other subsequent case law, customary international law
and treaties. The law describes the responsibilities and conduct of neutral nations, belligerent
nations as well as individuals that find themselves in a warfare and are in relation to one another.
IHL is designed in such a way that it balances military necessity and humanitarian concerns,
subjects armed conflicts to the regulation of law through mitigating human suffering and limiting
destructive effects of conflicts.
Review
International humanitarian law is deeply rooted in the rules of ancient religions and
civilizations, which mainly holds the principle that warfare has always been subject to particular
customs and principles. Universal codification of IHL started din the 19
various nations have consented to a series of practical rules, which are based on the bitter
experience exhibited in modern warfare (Meron, 1989). As the International community has
immensely grown, a number of nations have contributed to the development of these rules, such
the International Humanitarian Law currently forms a universal body of the law (Fleck, 2008). The
international humanitarian law is only applicable to armed conflict, and doesn’t cover internal
disturbances such as secluded acts of violence.
IHL is only applicable once a war has begun, and equally to both parties irrespective of
who initiated the fight. IHL clearly distinguishes between noninternational armed conflict and
international armed conflict. (Fleck, 2008) International armed conflicts refer to those conflicts
that at least two states are involved, and are a subject to wide range of rules, that includes the rules
set out in the Additional Protocol I and the 4 Geneva conventions. on the other side, non
international armed conflicts refers to those conflicts that are restricted to a territory of a particular
single state, that either involves armed groups fighting each other or armed groups that are fighting
armed groups of armed dissidents (Forsythe, 2005). A number of limited laws are applicable to
specific internal armed conflicts and are plainly laid down in Article 3 that are common to the 4
Geneva conventions and in Additional Protocol II.
However, it is important though, to differentiate between human rights law and
international humanitarian law. Though some of the rules of these two segments appear similar,
they have separately been developed and are contained in different treaties (Fleck, 2008). For
example, human rights law applies in peacetime, unlike IHL that applies during armed conflicts,
and some of its provisions might be suspended during armed conflicts.
International Humanitarian Law principles and provisions protecting civilians
Distinction Principle
Wednesday, 25 December 2013
Divorce Effects to Family
Introduction
Divorce
is considered an epidemic in any society it infiltrates, and occasionally off
springs are the most affected by the effects of divorce. Currently divorce is a
major menace in our social set up, and extremely common amongst us today.
Divorce plays an active role in re modelling culture, by changing the
definition of family.
The
trouble my roommate is undergoing according to mills is personal troubles.
Mills did believe that human beings were “entrapped” or alienated in a sense of
defencelessness in the centre of their personal problems. Sociological
imagination according to Mills refers to being able to overcome this
entrapment, which is being able to differentiate between “personal troubles”,
which often affect an individual, for example getting divorce, with “social
issues”, that reflect on a problem for the whole society, such as divorce (Mills, 2000).
Personal
troubles are closely related to social issues, since it enables us the general
in particular. Sociology majorly focus on the larger issue of divorce, and the
impact it has on the society. This broader view, will also enable us to be able
to the social forces that affect divorce, such as changing gender roles,
changing international relations, longer life expectancy, etc. in seeing a
relationship between the broader social issues of divorce and the personal
trouble of getting divorced, the individual is strengthened with and
understanding that she or he is not alone in this, and that the responsibility
is not on him or her, but on the social forces, that acts as the contributing
factors to this particular situation (Mills,
2000). This understanding enables us to take better control of our
lives, becoming shapers of our destiny and society, and not simply not just
being shaped by it, as well as accepting our troubles as “destiny” or “bad
luck”. Freedom is all about being able to know what these forces are and how
they operate so that we have an option of saying no, to any effect of their
operation. The main roles of sociology, is that it allows us to be able to the
forces that operate in us, then unite the puppet strings that bind us, and
therefore providing us with an option to be free. Understanding the
relationship between trouble and issues, empowers us to be able to know what is
taking place within us, and therefore be able to take charge of its course, by
determining the decision to take on its operatives, therefore making
individuals feel better (Mills, 2000).
The
worst case scenario would be for the children experiencing intense conflict,
have no option but to take sides, since they are unable to manage the internal
anxiety and tension they feel. For these individuals, they risk undergoing
serious psychological regression, where they view their parents as either bad
or good (Mills, 2000). The psychological
“splitting”, as it is referred to, is damaging to the off springs since it
reinforces a style whereby they picture the world in a “white and black” or
“nothing or all” way, rather than in a more balanced perception of bad and good
in most people. It is obvious that my roommate, will undergo the above effects,
and the only efficient way to handle them is to recognise them and learn of the
social forces that contributes to the effects of divorce, so that he knows how
manage the situation and not look down upon himself.
References
Mills,
C. W. (2000). The sociological
imagination. London: Oxford University Press.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)